Russell explains that the sense-date is a
complicated definition because it’s describing the “real information”, but is
there real information? How can we be sure that the experience of the color red
is the same experience for all of us?
We don’t know
if the statement is true, we only know that the things that describe the object
are true. A statement of fact is based on experiences, which can establish a
truth.
3. In chapter 5 ("Knowledge by
Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description") Russell introduces the notion
"definite description". What does this notion mean?
4. In chapter 13 ("Knowledge, Error
and Probable Opinion") and in chapter 14 ("The Limits of
Philosophical Knowledge") Russell attacks traditional problems in theory
of knowledge (epistemology). What are the main points in Russell's
presentation?
The problem with the traditional view of
true and false information is that it’s difficult to be sure if true
information IS true information. In the text Russell shows an example:
“If a man believes that the late Prime
Minister's last name began with a B, he believes what is true, since the late
Prime Minister was Sir Henry Campbell Bannerman. But if he believes that Mr.
Balfour was the late Prime Minister, he will still believe that the late Prime
Minister's last name began with a B, yet this belief, though true, would not be
thought to constitute knowledge.”
All the
information in the story is true, but still the statement is false and can’t be
classified as true knowledge.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar